![]() And I think the smartest thing we can do now (”we being society as a whole, but also initially and specifically artists, storytellers, and creators of all sorts) is presume it’s inevitability and act like it’s our operating reality now, today.īecause the likelihood is that a near-sentient AI (if it doesn’t already exist somewhere as you read this) will exist within the couple of years - if not among publicly available AI we know about, then in what’s being developed behind the scenes, even if developers don’t yet realize it. ![]() Skilled content creators are the ones who can apply it where it can best be utilized to maximize potential in both human and machine intelligence. The people using the current AI from a business and executive position in Hollywood are inherently misapplying it. Today, that translates into an imperative to ensure regulations aren’t used to restrict use of AI by artists, storytellers, and others who actually create things, while allowing unfettered exploitation of AI by executives and corporations at the expense of everyone else. Rather, we need to be careful in considering everyone’s motivations and the implications of what they want, so in the end we collectively as a society support whatever action protects and advances all of us together with AI, as opposed to protecting market positions and profits for elites and executives. This isn’t to say we don’t need regulations and restrictions. They’re all specific in what they want regulated, how they want it regulated, and meanwhile how much they want all of us to use their own latest AI (with AI advancing so quickly, the latest developments seem to come almost weekly now). To be clear, most business leaders who themselves invest in and create AI, and who are calling for regulations and restrictions, are less concerned with protecting the public and civilization, than with slowing down their competitors and giving themselves a leading edge in AI development and marketplaces. We can only talk about how to live with what’s inevitable now. So I think Senator Booker is correct - we waited to long to talk about it, so regulation at this stage and of the currently available AI is a pipe dream, and trying to regulate what’s in development is nearly impossible now that it’s reached such a rapid and rapidly evolving state of technological advancement. Our attempts to regulate it have already failed, because we’re trying to regulate an exponentially advancing super-intelligence that’s two years ahead of whatever we are talking about regulating today. We can’t even fully guess how it will fundamentally change our lives and civilization. Our perspective on AI is already hopelessly obsolete, because the current AI on market that we’re all so impressed with is actually what they were building nearly two years ago, everything we see in AI is outdated compared to what they have in development (which is happening behind the scenes and in secret, obviously, not to mention what sort of highly classified machine intelligence DARPA is cooking up). MORE FROM FORBES Critic Identifies The Secret Ingredients That Make Screenwriters Better Than A.I. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |